Irvington proudly prohibits homeowners from using gas leaf blowers. These dastardly devices plague communities with noise and harmful emissions that can only be mitigated by using less efficient electric blowers.1
Irvington’s Green Policy Task Force is not content with banning the devices, however. They insist that the use of gas leaf blowers – more than any other possible violation of village code – requires the most stringent enforcement and the evisceration of due process.
In their report to the trustees on November 18th, they lamented that callers to the police could not anonymously report on transgressions:

Why can’t we all just anonymously report crimes on our neighbors? What could possibly be wrong with having a Stasi-like apparatus in our village? It certainly won’t erode our trust in our neighbors or foster ill-will and paranoia. It’s not like there are any precedents for such a thing which we could refer to.
Why stop at anonymous reporting though? Why can’t punishment be dolled out absent due process? One must really watch the report from the meeting to believe the gall of what is proposed:
“I wonder is that absolutely necessary that the police have to witness it if you have video proof right there”
Should we offer unfettered access to convict our neighbors of these violations based on random recordings and anonymous complaints?
The line of questioning is an abhorrent dereliction of fundamental due process rights. Irvington’s mayor and trustees should immediately disband this unelected committee before it irreparably damages trust in the community and further erodes the rights of village residents.
Not to be outdone by the flagrant abuses to village resident rights, Trustee Burgos then interjects that she is dismayed that this rule is being enforced against the individuals caught perpetrating the violation of using the gas leaf blowers and appalled that homeowners are not actively punished in their stead.
“This ban and the summons I think it’s very important to me and I think it was to other people I think it’s wildly unfair that we just are ticketing the workers…so I think from from my perspective I guess from an equity perspective I’m concerned that the burden is on the workers um and so I do think it’s important to get more information on what those summonses are and I thought we made some changes to make sure that the like the homeowner I think the person who’s going to be the most effective in curtailing the um violation is going to be the homeowner”
Yes – to ensure “equity” in the village of Irvington our illustrious trustees have drafted this rule such that three parties are simultaneously responsible for using a gas leaf blower: the worker, the landscaping company, and the homeowner.

I wonder what sort of legal muster this passes in court. If a homeowner tells the landscaper not to use the gas blower and they do it anyway, is the homeowner still at fault?
What other laws and rules should be enforced upon property owners for illegal actions committed by third parties absent their consent? If someone walks around Trustee Burgos’s home with a gas leaf blower, will she owe a fine? The problems with this enforcement mechanism are comical and absurd.
Unrelenting, the Green Policy Task Force further concludes that landscapers should lose their license for these violations ($250-$500 fines are insufficient punishment), and repeat offenders must be punished – even if the complaints are deemed unfounded.

Let’s play this out: under the proposed system, one could make anonymous complaints repeatedly against a neighbor, and whether or not a violation was observed to have occurred, the existence of these multiple reported violations would give cause for the police to sit outside one’s property and monitor a village resident.
Our mayor concludes that the ban is a wild success, however, so all is well in Irvington.
“So Charlotte, the take way is basically though that this has been very successful yes and that that there’s been a tremendous improvement in quality of life for residents”
Make what you will of the village’s ban of gas leaf blowers, but vile impulses articulated on the subject of its enforcement are far more toxic to our community than whatever emissions are generated from a few two-stroke engines.
- It is estimated that a gas-powered leaf blower emits 1 pound of CO2 per hour of use, while an electric blower produces an equivalent of 0.9 pounds per hour. Glad we are 10% more efficient! If Irvington really wants to curb residents’ emissions, however, they should really consider banning all village residents from flying. One passenger’s contribution on one flight between New York and Florida would represent the equivalent of 220-330 pounds of CO2 emissions.